Case 2401435/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B White v St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401435/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
- Panel members
- Mr A Clarke, Mrs A Berkeley-Hill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B White
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant withdrew her claims of indirect age discrimination and discrimination contrary to the Fixed Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002. Those claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal found the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and discrimination contrary to the Part Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 to be well-founded and they succeeded. Reasons were given orally, and the written judgment records no further factual findings or legal analysis.
The respondent was ordered to pay a basic award of £1,650 and a compensatory award of £4,448, comprising £350 for loss of statutory rights and £4,098 for eight weeks' loss of income. The figures were based on the parties' agreement about the amount of a week's pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Claim of indirect age discrimination dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Fixed-term employee regulations | Claim contrary to the Fixed Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002 dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeded; compensation was awarded as a basic award of £1,650 and compensatory award of £4,448. | Upheld | — | £6,098 |
| Part-time worker regulations | The judgment states that the claim contrary to the Part Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 was well-founded and succeeded, but does not identify a separate monetary award for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,098
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,650
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,448
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.