Case 2402046/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Sophie Mulrooney v Pure Business Group Limited (In Administration) and 3 others — 2022

Case reference: 2402046/2022
Decision date: 14 November 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ross Date

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

5 named

Claimant

Sophie Mulrooney

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal, sitting under Rule 21 on the papers, held that the claimant's complaint under section 180 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, concerning the second respondent's failure to comply with section 188, was well founded. It ordered the second respondent to pay the claimant and the other claimants listed in the attached schedule a protective award.

The award was for remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 2 November 2021, the date of the dismissals for redundancy. The annex states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply. The extracted text does not state a cash total for the award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Protective award / collective redundancy consultation complaint under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; the dispositive paragraph refers to section 180 and section 188. The tribunal found the complaint well founded and ordered 90 days' remuneration beginning 2 November 2021, but the extracted text does not state a cash total.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.