Case 2402047/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Phil Hunt v Pure Business Group Limited (In Administration) and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2402047/2022
- Decision date
- 14 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Date
Parties
5 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant’s complaint under section 180 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded because the fourth respondent had failed to comply with the consultation requirements in section 188. The judgment identifies the relevant dismissals as redundancy dismissals on 2 November 2021.
By way of protective award, the Tribunal ordered the fourth respondent to pay the claimant and the other claimants listed on the attached schedule remuneration for a period of 90 days beginning 2 November 2021. The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations apply. No separate monetary sum is set out in the extracted text beyond the 90-day protected period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under section 180 of TULRCA 1992 for failure to comply with section 188. The Tribunal ordered remuneration for a 90-day protected period beginning 2 November 2021, but the extracted text does not state a cash total. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 180 TULRCA 1992
- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.