Case 2404645/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Stewart v Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404645/2023
- Decision date
- 10 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Representatives
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Stewart
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined preliminary jurisdiction issues only. It assumed in the claimant's favour that the alleged discrimination and harassment formed conduct extending over a period, but found that the period could have ended no later than the end of employment on 1 October 2022. After allowing for the ACAS early conciliation extension, the tribunal found the latest date for presenting those complaints was 11 February 2023, whereas the claim was presented on 24 April 2023.
The tribunal considered whether it was just and equitable to extend time for the discrimination and harassment complaints. It accepted that the claimant's circumstances were likely to have made it more difficult for her to present the claim, but concluded that an extension would disadvantage the respondent because the allegations depended heavily on recollection, were unlikely to have been documented, and might require consideration of events over a long period. The tribunal also noted that, on the evidence available, the claimant had not engaged with opportunities to discuss adjustments that might have enabled her to give the evidence needed to prove the claim.
As to unauthorised deduction from wages, the tribunal treated the complaint, if made at all, as relating to sick pay paid at a lower rate than normal pay. It concluded that the complaint was also out of time and that the claimant had not shown it was not reasonably practicable to present it within the statutory period. The tribunal therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to consider any of the complaints and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the disability discrimination complaint was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the harassment complaint was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint was out of time and the claimant had not shown it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. Paragraph 35 appears to contain a date inconsistency, stating 10 April 2022 while also stating the claim was presented 14 days late. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- conduct extending over a period
- just and equitable extension of time
- Sougrin v Haringey Health Authority
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police v Caston
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University v Morgan
- British Coal Corpn v Keeble
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.