Case 2405815/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Karen Rahman v University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2405815/2023
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mrs Cathy Gallagher, Mr Ian Frame
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Karen Rahman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant's claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments, disability harassment and constructive unfair dismissal were presented out of time on 14 May 2023. It concluded that it had no jurisdiction to hear the Equality Act claims because they were not presented within a just and equitable further period, and no jurisdiction to hear the constructive unfair dismissal claim because it was not presented within such further period as the Tribunal considered reasonable.
On the disability issues addressed in the reasons, the respondent accepted that the claimant was disabled by depression and degenerative spinal disease, but did not accept that diabetes amounted to a disability. The Tribunal preferred the respondent's evidence on disputed knowledge of the spinal condition by the claimant's line manager and was not satisfied that the alleged driving, office chair, DSE assessment or lone-working matters put the claimant at a substantial disadvantage in the way alleged.
The Tribunal also stated that the constructive dismissal claim would have failed even if it had jurisdiction. It drew an inference from the resignation letter and the claimant's completion of an eight-week notice period that she did not then believe the respondent had destroyed or seriously damaged trust and confidence, and it was not satisfied that the respondent had acted in that way.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments contrary to sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed because it was presented out of time and the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment on grounds of disability contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed because it was presented out of time and the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal contrary to section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed because it was presented out of time and the Tribunal found it was not presented within such further period as it considered reasonable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 95 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- just and equitable extension
- implied term of trust and confidence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.