Case 2408454/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Swan v Petrie Tucker and Partners Limited t/a mydentist — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408454/2021
- Decision date
- 28 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Swan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Swan brought claims for age, race and sexual orientation harassment against Petrie Tucker and Partners Ltd t/a Mydentist. The tribunal did not reach the merits of the allegations because the claims in the claim form presented on 18 June 2021 were found to be out of time under s.123(1)(a) of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal also found that it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b). On that basis, all three harassment claims were dismissed.
No monetary award was made and no split remedy figures were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Dismissed because the age harassment claim was not brought within the relevant time limits under s.123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b). | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed because the race harassment claim was not brought within the relevant time limits under s.123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b). | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed because the sexual orientation harassment claim was not brought within the relevant time limits under s.123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123(1)(b). | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.