Case 2410333/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Singh v Select Service Partner UK Ltd and 1 other — 2018
- Case reference
- 2410333/2018
- Decision date
- 18 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Singh
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew the complaints of unfair dismissal, religion and belief discrimination, failure to pay holiday pay, and failure to pay pay during compassionate leave. Those complaints were dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the remaining complaints. It recorded that the complaints of direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, and victimisation would proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint of failure to pay holiday pay dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of failure to pay pay during compassionate leave dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; exact legal label is not specified in the judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The complaint of direct race discrimination was not determined in this judgment and was listed to proceed to a final hearing. | Other | Race | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment related to race was not determined in this judgment and was listed to proceed to a final hearing. | Other | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The complaint of victimisation was not determined in this judgment and was listed to proceed to a final hearing. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.