Case 2415329/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Dr R Kubaisi v University Hospitals Of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 2415329/2021
- Decision date
- 22 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr R Kubaisi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing at Manchester by CVP, Employment Judge Anderson recorded withdrawals concerning claims numbered 2410093/2022 and 2406660/2023. In claim number 2410093/2022, the claimant no longer alleged as discrete acts of discrimination, victimisation, or detriment the claimant being made aware of the GMC referral on 24 April 2022 or the GMC outcome of 11 July 2022. The claims of direct sex discrimination and race discrimination in that claim were dismissed on withdrawal.
In claim number 2406660/2023, the claims of direct sex discrimination and harassment related to sex were dismissed on withdrawal. The respondent's applications for strike out and/or a deposit order were refused. The judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested; it records no monetary remedy or substantive findings on the remaining claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | In claim number 2410093/2022, the claims of direct sex discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal; in claim number 2406660/2023, the claims of direct sex discrimination were also dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | In claim number 2410093/2022, the claims of race discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Harassment | In claim number 2406660/2023, the claims of harassment related to sex were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | In claim number 2410093/2022, two matters concerning the GMC referral and the GMC outcome were no longer alleged to be discrete acts of victimisation; the judgment does not state that the whole victimisation claim was withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | In claim number 2410093/2022, two matters concerning the GMC referral and the GMC outcome were no longer alleged to be discrete detriments; the judgment does not state that the whole public interest disclosure or detriment claim was withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.