Case 2501945/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Robinson v NHS Business Services Authority — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501945/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Ms Hunter, Ms Wiles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Jeram, Ms Hunter and Ms Wiles, with reasons given orally and recorded on 29 April 2022. Mrs S Robinson represented herself and NHS Business Services Authority was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims of disability discrimination, disability-related harassment, victimisation, pregnancy discrimination and pregnancy detriment were not well founded and were dismissed. It also found that the claims had been presented outside the relevant time limits.
No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim dismissed; the tribunal also found it was presented outside the relevant time limits. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Disability-related harassment claim dismissed; the tribunal also found it was presented outside the relevant time limits. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Claim dismissed; the tribunal also found it was presented outside the relevant time limits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Pregnancy discrimination claim dismissed; the tribunal also found it was presented outside the relevant time limits. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Pregnancy detriment claim dismissed; the tribunal also found it was presented outside the relevant time limits. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.