Case 2503626/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Smith v Health Education England — 2021
- Case reference
- 2503626/2018
- Decision date
- 25 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Non-Legal
- Panel members
- Ms E Wiles, Mr S Wykes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Smith brought claims against Health Education England for discrimination because of something arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, victimisation under section 27, failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20, 21 and 39(5), and disability-related harassment under section 26. The tribunal sat remotely in Newcastle by video link over hearing dates in March 2021, before Employment Judge S Shore with non-legal members Ms E Wiles and Mr S Wykes.
The tribunal unanimously found that each of those claims failed. The judgment provided here records the liability outcomes only and does not set out any compensation or other remedy award.
It also states that any other claim made or intimated in the claimant's original application or during the proceedings was dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010 (discrimination because of something arising from disability). | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Claim under section 27 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim that the respondent failed to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20, 21 and 39(5) Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim of disability-related harassment under section 26 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Other | The judgment states that any other claim made or intimated in the original application or during the proceedings was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.