Case 2600155/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Zerehannes v Asda Stores Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600155/2018
- Decision date
- 29 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Zerehannes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Camp sitting alone, the tribunal dealt with the respondent's deposit-order application and the claimant's remaining discrimination complaints. All complaints of discriminatory harassment and of indirect discrimination were dismissed by consent upon withdrawal.
The tribunal then considered the claimant's remaining associative direct disability discrimination complaint, which was described as the claimant's only remaining disability discrimination claim and as comprising the series of complaints numbered 1 to 6 in the Scott schedule. The judge said the central difficulty for the disability complaints was causation.
The tribunal was not satisfied that the associative direct disability discrimination claim had no reasonable prospects of success, but it was satisfied that it had little reasonable prospect of success. The judge said there was, at best, no proper basis on which the final tribunal could decide that any mistreatment of the claimant was because of the claimant's wife's disability.
A deposit order of £1,000 was therefore made as a condition of continuing to advance the associative direct disability discrimination complaint, with the judge noting that the claimant's ability to comply had been taken into account when fixing the amount.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | All complaints of discriminatory harassment were dismissed by consent upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The complaint of indirect discrimination was dismissed by consent upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Associative direct disability discrimination claim, said to concern the claimant's wife's disability, was not found to have no reasonable prospects of success but was assessed as having little reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal made a deposit order of £1,000, payable within 21 days, as a condition of continuing to advance that complaint. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- little reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.