Case 2601055/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Emil Nowicki v Clipper Logistics plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601055/2019
- Decision date
- 10 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Members
- Panel members
- Mr M Alibhai, Mr A Beveridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Emil Nowicki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat remotely by video on 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9 September 2021 before Employment Judge Ahmed with lay members Mr M Alibhai and Mr A Beveridge. The written record states that the unanimous decision was to dismiss the claimant’s complaints of direct disability discrimination, harassment on the ground of disability, less favourable treatment by reason of being a part-time worker, and victimisation.
The published decision records the outcome only. It also states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and the claims were all dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Part-time worker regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.