Case 2603246/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Smith v Loscoe Chilled Foods Limited (in Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2603246/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a closed telephone preliminary hearing before Employment Judge P Britton on 22 January 2020. The claimant had presented an ET1 on 4 November 2019. The tribunal noted that the pleaded material events ended on 22 May 2019, that the claimant’s employment ended on 7 August 2019, and that the claimant was said to be 23 when she left the employment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the direct sex discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal stated that the remaining claim was one of sexual harassment under sections 26(1) and 26(2) of the Equality Act 2010. No merits outcome was determined at this hearing; the claim was listed for a later preliminary hearing on limitation. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.