Case 3200639/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D. Stripe v Clarion Housing Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3200639/2020
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Members
- Panel members
- Mrs G. Forrest, Mrs B. Saund
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D. Stripe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent accepted that the claimant was disabled by fibromyalgia, and the tribunal treated IBS, chronic idiopathic urticaria, stress, anxiety and depression as part of the relevant constellation of symptoms rather than separate disabilities. The reasonable adjustments claims failed because the tribunal found the requirements relied on were proposed but not applied in practice, or that the respondent had taken the relevant steps, including continued working at Vange, retention of adapted equipment, parking arrangements, flexibility, homeworking where needed, and dealing with the grievance within a reasonable timescale.
The harassment claim about the occupational health referral was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it was out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. The tribunal also said that, if it had jurisdiction, the phrase complained of was unwanted conduct related to disability but did not meet the statutory harassment threshold. The harassment allegation about the grievance appeal meeting failed because the tribunal found the alleged conduct by Mr Moody did not occur and was not linked to disability.
The tribunal found protected acts in the claimant's grievances of 3 September and 26 November 2019, but dismissed the victimisation claims. It found the occupational health referral issue was out of time and predated the first protected act, the delay in the grievance had an adequate non-discriminatory explanation, and the alleged conduct at the appeal meeting was not proved.
For constructive dismissal, the tribunal found no breach of an express contractual term because the claimant's contractual base was Bishops Stortford. It found that Mr Morling's 20 November 2019 proposal that the claimant work five days a week at Bishops Stortford was likely seriously to damage trust and confidence, but the claimant did not resign in response to that breach. The tribunal found she had accepted new employment with Citizens Advice and, alternatively, had affirmed the contract by remaining employed, being on sick leave, and then returning to work before resigning.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claim dismissed. The tribunal found the alleged PCPs were not applied, or that adjustments had been made within a reasonable period. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability dismissed. One occupational health referral allegation was out of time and not extended; another part was withdrawn. The alleged conduct at the grievance appeal meeting was found not to have occurred. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claims dismissed. The tribunal found protected acts in the September and November 2019 grievances, but the alleged detriments were out of time, predated the protected act, had a non-discriminatory explanation, or were not shown to have occurred. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Claim of unfair constructive dismissal dismissed. The tribunal found one proposal on 20 November 2019 breached the implied term of trust and confidence, but the claimant did not resign in response to it and in any event affirmed the contract before resigning. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
30 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- Hendricks v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Base Childrenswear Ltd v Otshudi
- Madarassy v Nomura International plc
- Deman v Commission for Equality and Human Rights
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd
- Aderemi v London and South Eastern Railway Ltd
- Ministry of Defence v Hay
- Gallop v Newport City Council
- s.20 Equality Act 2010
- s.21 Equality Act 2010
- Nottingham City Transport Ltd v Harvey
- Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd v De Groen
- Ishola v Transport for London
- Rider v Leeds City Council
- Smith v Salford NHS Primary Care Trust
- NCH Scotland v McHugh
- Doran v Department for Work and Pensions
- Morse v Wiltshire County Council
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- Unite the Union v Nailard
- Land Registry v Grant
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board v Hughes
- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.95(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp 1978 1 QB 761 dissolution whether employer actions were repudiatory breach, constructive dismissal test? unchecked exact citation okay no extra? Need JSON valid.
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.