Case 3201353/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr U Majeed v MTR Corporation (Crossrail) Limited t/a MTR Elizabeth Line — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201353/2023
- Decision date
- 4 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Townley Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mr Havard, Mr Webb
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr U Majeed
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, direct race discrimination, and discrimination arising from disability. The holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal, and applications to amend to add harassment and victimisation claims were dismissed.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal found that the respondent's principal reason for dismissal was gross misconduct relating to the claimant's absence from work while in Pakistan and his failure to provide clear evidence during the investigation. The tribunal found that the respondent had a genuine and reasonably held belief in the misconduct, had reasonable grounds for that belief, and acted within the range of reasonable responses, although it described dismissal as harsh.
For discrimination arising from disability, the tribunal found that the treatment was not because of something arising in consequence of disability; it also stated that, if wrong on that issue, the treatment would have been proportionate and reasonably necessary to achieve the legitimate aim of maintaining discipline and the trustworthiness of the workforce. The prompt text records that the direct race discrimination claim was dismissed, but the middle of the judgment text containing the detailed race findings was truncated.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the direct race discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the discrimination arising from disability claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal on 11 June 2025. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | The claimant's application to amend his claim by adding harassment was dismissed on 3 June 2025; reconsideration was dismissed on 11 June 2025. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | The claimant's application to amend his claim by adding victimisation was dismissed on 3 June 2025; reconsideration was dismissed on 11 June 2025. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- range of reasonable responses
- ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures
- proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.