Case 3201451/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Hayes v Rendall and Rittner — 2022
- Case reference
- 3201451/2020
- Decision date
- 24 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Members
- Panel members
- Mrs M Legg, Mr P Pendle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Hayes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting with Employment Judge Moor and members Mrs M Legg and Mr P Pendle, gave a unanimous judgment after a public video hearing at East London Hearing Centre on 18, 19, 20 and 21 January 2022.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and did not succeed. The Tribunal also found that the Respondent did not subject Mr Hayes to any unlawful detriment on the ground that he made protected disclosures.
The reasonable adjustments complaint succeeded in one respect: the Tribunal found that the Respondent failed to make a reasonable adjustment by not offering to reschedule the disciplinary hearing after 6 April 2020. All other claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments did not succeed, and the Tribunal also recorded that the Respondent did not unlawfully harass the Claimant.
The holiday pay claim was not well-founded and did not succeed. The judgment extract records no monetary remedy or award figure.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal was recorded as not well-founded and did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The Tribunal found that the Respondent did not subject the Claimant to any unlawful detriment on the ground that he made protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found a failure to make a reasonable adjustment because the Respondent did not offer to reschedule the disciplinary hearing after 6 April 2020. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | All other claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments did not succeed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The Tribunal recorded that the Respondent did not unlawfully harass the Claimant; the short judgment does not set out further particulars of the harassment allegation. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was recorded as not well-founded and did not succeed. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.