Case 3202217/2023 · Employment Tribunal
The Personal Representatives of Ian McCrow v London Underground Limited and 3 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 3202217/2023
- Decision date
- 28 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- London East
Parties
5 namedClaimant
The Personal Representatives of Ian McCrow
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract for notice pay, finding that those complaints had no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The Tribunal did not strike out the claimant's disability discrimination complaints brought under sections 13, 15, 19, 20 and 21, and 26 of the Equality Act 2010. Those complaints were directed to proceed to a final hearing by Cloud Video Platform at London East Employment Tribunal in July 2025.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records the strike-out decisions and that case management orders would be issued separately, but does not set out the underlying reasoning or any remedy determination.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Rule 38(1)(a) on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay complaint was struck out under Rule 38(1)(a) on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaints under sections 13, 15, 19, 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 were not struck out and were listed to proceed to a final hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The section 26 Equality Act 2010 complaint was not struck out and was listed to proceed to a final hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 38(1)(a) of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- sections 13, 15, 19, 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.