Case 3204693/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Hagger v Priory Group and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204693/2021
- Decision date
- 25 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge AMS Green
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Miss C Hagger
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge AMS Green had ordered the Claimant to provide further information by 4 April 2022 and stated that, if the information was not provided by that date, the disability discrimination and unfair dismissal claims would be dismissed without further order.
The Claimant did not provide the required information by the required date or at all, and did not explain why it had not been done. There was no application for relief from sanction. The Tribunal therefore dismissed the disability discrimination and unfair dismissal complaints.
The judgment records that the remaining unpaid salary complaint had not yet been determined, although the Tribunal was considering striking it out on the basis that it was not being actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed without further order after failure to provide further information required by the case management order. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed without further order after failure to provide further information required by the case management order. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.