Case 3300547/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Jacqueline Ward v Slough Children’s Services Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300547/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Chudleigh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jacqueline Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing heard by telephone on 18 March 2020 before Employment Judge Chudleigh sitting alone. The claimant was Jacqueline Ward and the respondent was Slough Children’s Services Trust.
The judgment records that the claims of indirect race discrimination, direct disability discrimination, and harassment on the grounds of disability were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability were made in the text provided beyond that disposition.
No remedy was awarded or discussed in the extracted judgment text. The record is limited to the procedural dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records the indirect race discrimination claim as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records the direct disability discrimination claim as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records the harassment claim on the grounds of disability as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.