Case 3300934/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Keesoony v West London NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300934/2024
- Decision date
- 28 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings Tribunal
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- S. Jenkins, J. Schiebler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Keesoony
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal accepted that the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of cancer. The claimant complained of harassment related to disability, victimisation, and discrimination arising from disability after her diagnosis, sickness absence, and communications with the respondent.
The Tribunal dismissed all three complaints. In the final reasons provided in the prompt, it found that the respondent's informal absence meeting approach was not unfavourable treatment, because the respondent did not proceed to a formal stage 2 absence process and the proposed informal meeting was deferred and did not take place.
The Tribunal also found that the decision not to return the claimant to WLFS was a management decision arising from the breakdown of the restorative resolution process and the available role constraints, not because of disability or a protected act. The prompt text omits the middle portion of the judgment, so this summary is limited to the stated conclusions and visible reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to disability under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Complaint of victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010 was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- Chandok & Anor v Tirkey 2014 UKEAT/0190/14/KN
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.