Case 3305913/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Mason v Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 3305913/2024
- Decision date
- 23 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rakhim
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Mason
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant brought complaints of direct disability discrimination, harassment related to disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, and unauthorised deductions from wages.
Each complaint was found to be not well-founded and was dismissed. The judgment does not set out reasons beyond the stated outcomes and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of direct disability discrimination was stated to be not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment related to disability was stated to be not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was stated to be not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was stated to be not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.