Case 3312902/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs Charlotte Ferizolli v London Underground Limited — 2024

Case reference: 3312902/2021
Decision date: 25 January 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Young Non
Venue: Watford
Panel members: Mrs G Bhatt, Mr P Miller

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs Charlotte Ferizolli

Respondent

London Underground Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal accepted that the claimant was disabled by dyslexia and autism, but found that depression and anxiety were not disabilities for the purposes of the pleaded allegations. It also found that the respondent did not have the relevant knowledge of anxiety or depression at the times relied on.

Several allegations were dismissed as out of time and the tribunal declined to extend time on a just and equitable basis. For the allegations considered on their merits, the tribunal found that key events or PCPs were not established, that some matters were not because of a protected characteristic, and that the pleaded reasonable adjustment disadvantages were not made out.

The harassment complaints were dismissed because the tribunal found the relevant incidents did not happen as alleged, or because specific issues were withdrawn. No monetary remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

9 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Direct disability discrimination allegation about delayed start of full-time contract was dismissed; the tribunal found no less favourable treatment and that the delay was not because of disability.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Sex discrimination	Direct sex discrimination allegation about a male worker kicking the claimant's train was dismissed as out of time and outside the tribunal's jurisdiction.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Race discrimination	Direct race discrimination allegation about a worker accusing the claimant of mixing him up with another black male worker was dismissed as out of time and outside the tribunal's jurisdiction.	Dismissed	Race	—
Disability discrimination	Discrimination arising from disability allegation concerning the claimant being told she was unable to drive while taking Sertraline was dismissed; the tribunal found the pleaded disabilities did not include depression and anxiety and the respondent did not have the required knowledge at the relevant time.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Indirect disability discrimination allegation about informal learning through colleagues in the canteen was dismissed; the tribunal found the pleaded PCP was not made out.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

14 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.