Case 4105602/2020 · Employment Tribunal
member O’Hagan Tribunal member Taggart Ms S Richards v Represented by: Herself T Squared Shared Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4105602/2020
- Decision date
- 27 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Tribunal
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- O'Hagan, Taggart
Parties
2 namedClaimant
member O’Hagan Tribunal member Taggart Ms S Richards
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Glasgow on 20 to 23 July 2021, the tribunal dealt with claims for holiday pay, direct disability discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, harassment under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010, unfair dismissal, part-time worker discrimination under the Part Time Worker (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000, unlawful detriment under section 47E(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, unlawful deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and breach of contract under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1995. The holiday pay, disability discrimination and harassment claims were dismissed after the claimant withdrew them during the hearing.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded because the claimant had not been dismissed. It also found that the part-time worker discrimination claim and the unlawful detriment claim were not well founded, and that the unlawful deduction of wages and breach of contract claims were not well founded. All claims were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim during the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010; dismissed following withdrawal during the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Unlawful harassment under section 26 Equality Act 2010; dismissed following withdrawal during the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well founded because the claimant was not dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Part-time worker regulations | Claim under the Part Time Worker (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000; not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Unlawful detriment claim pursuant to section 47E(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996; not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; not well founded. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.