Case 6000058/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Michael Cotteral v Currys plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000058/2023
- Decision date
- 3 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Michael Cotteral
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of harassment related to race and disability discrimination by failure to make reasonable adjustments. The respondent accepted that, at the relevant time, the claimant was disabled by reason of lateral epicondylitis and depression. The preliminary hearing considered jurisdiction for the race harassment claim and case management for the remaining claims.
The alleged race harassment concerned comments said to have been made by the claimant's line manager after the claimant bought a BMW in June 2019, with the last alleged comment in October 2019. The Tribunal found this was not a continuing act, as the claimant said there was no repetition after he challenged the manager in October 2019.
The claim was not presented until 10 January 2023, after ACAS early conciliation began on 7 November 2022. The Tribunal found there was no good reason for the delay, noted the claimant had raised the matter in internal processes well before contacting ACAS, and concluded that the age of the events would make it extremely difficult for people to remember what was said and the context. It was not satisfied that it would be just and equitable to extend time, so the race harassment claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The disability discrimination claims were left to proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the harassment related to race claim because it was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.140B Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble & Others [1997] IRLR 336
- Secretary of State for Justice v Johnson [2022] EAT 1
- Bexley Community Centre v Robertson [2003] IRLR 434
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.