Case 6019706/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Robertson v University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019706/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Robertson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge B Smith, sitting alone at London Central on 1 December 2025, struck out the claims because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine them. The judgment records that the affected complaints included, but were not limited to, failure to make reasonable adjustments in case no. 2204543/2021, harassment related to disability between 20 September 2019 and 29 October 2020, victimisation between February 2023 and October 2023, and breach of the COT3 agreement dated 13 October 2023.
The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of those complaints. It is limited to the jurisdictional strike-out order, so no remedy was awarded and no liability findings were made on the underlying allegations.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment says the claim was struck out because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine it. The complaints affected include, but are not limited to, harassment related to disability between 20 September 2019 and 29 October 2020 from case no. 2204543/2021. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment says the claim was struck out because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine it. The complaints affected include, but are not limited to, victimisation occurring between February 2023 and October 2023. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claim was struck out because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine it. The complaints affected include, but are not limited to, breach of the COT3 agreement dated 13 October 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment says the claim was struck out because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine it. The complaints affected include, but are not limited to, failure to make reasonable adjustments from case no. 2204543/2021. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.