Case 6022904/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Odegbami v Ingeus UK Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6022904/2024
- Decision date
- 18 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Odegbami
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing, the tribunal allowed the claimant's application to amend her claim in part. Amendments were permitted for failure to make reasonable adjustments, direct disability discrimination, victimisation, and discrimination arising from disability as set out in the List of Issues referred to in the judgment.
The tribunal did not permit amendments to bring claims for breach of the public sector equality duty, breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, harassment, indirect disability discrimination, or unpaid wages. The judgment records amendment rulings only; it does not determine the merits of the underlying claims or make any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The preliminary hearing permitted amendments to claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments, direct disability discrimination, and discrimination arising from disability. The merits of those claims were not determined. | Other | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The preliminary hearing permitted amendments to the victimisation claim. The merits of the claim were not determined. | Other | — | — |
| Harassment | The preliminary hearing did not permit an amendment to bring a harassment claim. The judgment does not record a merits determination. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The preliminary hearing did not permit an amendment to bring an indirect disability discrimination claim. The judgment does not record a merits determination. | Other | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The preliminary hearing did not permit an amendment to bring an unpaid wages claim. The judgment does not record a merits determination. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The preliminary hearing did not permit amendments to bring claims for breach of the public sector equality duty or breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.