Loading page content.
TopEmployer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 7 cases involving religion or belief discrimination claims against DHL Services Limited, out of 187 total cases on record for this employer. See also all religion or belief discrimination cases across every employer.
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1305161/2020 | 26 April 2026 | England & Wales | Mr M Arif | Disability discrimination, Religion or belief discrimination, Unfair dismissal | — |
| 1305836/2023 | 28 March 2025 | England & Wales | Mr P Ignatowicz | Religion or belief discrimination, Sex discrimination, Unfair dismissal | £15,252 |
| 1309371/2022 | 9 August 2024 | England & Wales | Mr Q Akbar | Religion or belief discrimination, Unfair dismissal | — |
| 4112057/2021 | 17 August 2022 | Scotland | EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112057/2021 & 4112399/2021 Held in Glasgow on 13, 14, and June 2022 Employment Judge - A Strain Members – I Ashraf and S Singh Mr Martin Doyle | Religion or belief discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 1300933/2021 | 9 June 2022 | England & Wales | Mr Syed Hashmi | Disability discrimination, Race discrimination, Religion or belief discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages | — |
| 3306097/2020 | 18 April 2021 | England & Wales | Did not attend and was not represented For the | Race discrimination, Religion or belief discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages | — |
| 3313488/2019 | 13 May 2020 | England & Wales | Mr J Martin | Whistleblowing, Race discrimination, Religion or belief discrimination, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
This page lists the subset of DHL Services Limited's tribunal cases tagged with religion or belief discrimination in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.