Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, Edinburgh and April 2026 A. Upon considering on th and upon resuming consideration on April 2026 in terms of Rule of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024, of the nd named has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Sex discrimination | 1 | |
| 02 | Unfair dismissal | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4102140/2023 | 14 May 2026 | Scotland | made, in terms of Rule 69, on January 2026 for Reconsideration of the Tribunal’s Judgment of th, issued to parties on th, April 2026 4102140/2023 & 4105349/2023 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno E McDougall | Sex discrimination, Unfair dismissal | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.