Case 4102140/2023 · Employment Tribunal
made, in terms of Rule 69, on January 2026 for Reconsideration of the Tribunal’s Judgment of th, issued to parties on th, April 2026 4102140/2023 & 4105349/2023 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno E McDougall v ETZ 4(WR) IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) AT EDINBURGH Reconsideration and Determination, in terms of Rule 70, of the Application at the instance of the Second Named and 3 others — 2026
- Case reference
- 4102140/2023
- Decision date
- 14 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
5 namedClaimant
made, in terms of Rule 69, on January 2026 for Reconsideration of the Tribunal’s Judgment of th, issued to parties on th, April 2026 4102140/2023 & 4105349/2023 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno E McDougall
Respondents
- ETZ 4(WR) IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) AT EDINBURGH Reconsideration and Determination, in terms of Rule 70, of the Application at the instance of the Second Named
- Arnold Clark Automobiles Limited st
- N Gilhooly nd
- Edinburgh and April 2026 A. Upon considering on th and upon resuming consideration on April 2026 in terms of Rule of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024, of the nd named
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe second respondent, Neil Gilhooly, applied under Rule 69 for reconsideration of the Tribunal’s judgment issued on 9 April 2026. His application challenged the underlying findings that the claimant had experienced five instances of harassment related to sex and sexual harassment, including a finding that in January 2023 he unhooked the claimant’s bra while she was sitting at her desk. The Tribunal concluded under Rule 70(2) that there was no reasonable prospect of the judgment being varied or revoked and refused the application.