Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, ’s representative without success. On the morning of the hearing, when contacted by the clerk, Mrs Angell indicated that she was not able to join the hearing from the laptop she had borrowed. Mrs Angell was advised that the hearing would proceed at 10.30 am and if she had not join the hearing by that stage, the hearing would proceed in her absence. 7. Mrs Angell sent an email timed at 10.30 am saying that she could not join and asking whether a postponement of the hearing could be granted. This email was not seen by me until the hearing had concluded. 8. I heard submissions from counsel for the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Whistleblowing | 1 | |
| 02 | Unfair dismissal | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4109935/2021 | 25 October 2022 | Scotland | Mr M Angell | Whistleblowing, Unfair dismissal | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.