Loading page content.
TopEmployer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 5 cases involving working time regulations claims against JD Sports Fashion plc, out of 14 total cases on record for this employer. See also all working time regulations cases across every employer.
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1805742/2023 | 14 January 2026 | England & Wales | Mr A Boyce | Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Whistleblowing, Race discrimination, Sex discrimination, Sexual orientation discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Victimisation, Working time regulations | — |
| 1405488/2023 | 19 December 2024 | England & Wales | Mr Peter Crates | Age discrimination, Breach of contract, Pregnancy and maternity discrimination, Sex discrimination, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 4104710/2020 | 8 April 2022 | Scotland | EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104710/2020 Hearing Held by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on and March 2022 Employment Judge - A Strain Members – W Canning and L Hutchison Ms K Edwards | Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 2406053/2020 | 25 August 2020 | England & Wales | Mr P Kay | Breach of contract, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 4110498/2019 | 24 December 2019 | Scotland | EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110498/2019 Ms C Letson | Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
This page lists the subset of JD Sports Fashion plc's tribunal cases tagged with working time regulations in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.