Employer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 9 cases involving breach of contract claims against Marshall Eaton Holdings Limited, out of 13 total cases on record for this employer. See also all breach of contract cases across every employer.
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3304235/2020 | 30 April 2026 | England & Wales | Esther Wildschut | Breach of contract, Working time regulations | — |
| 3303928/2023 | 28 March 2024 | England & Wales | Mr A Gera | Breach of contract, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £34,272 |
| 3302515/2023 | 28 March 2024 | England & Wales | Mr E Kalnroze | Breach of contract, Unlawful deduction from wages | £17,794 |
| 3303037/2023 | 28 March 2024 | England & Wales | Miss K Lynch | Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £216,294 |
| 3302349/2023 | 28 March 2024 | England & Wales | Mr A Rothwell | Breach of contract, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £8,685 |
| 3306052/2023 | 28 March 2024 | England & Wales | Mr K Rabdiya | Breach of contract, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £21,478 |
| 3300580/2023 | 28 March 2024 | England & Wales | Ms E Ridgway | Breach of contract, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £5,037 |
| 3301903/2023 | 3 January 2024 | England & Wales | Miss B Louw | Breach of contract, Unlawful deduction from wages | £15,778 |
| 3302346/2023 | 15 March 2023 | England & Wales | Miss K Hill | Breach of contract, Unlawful deduction from wages | £5,733 |
This page lists the subset of Marshall Eaton Holdings Limited's tribunal cases tagged with breach of contract in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.