Loading…

Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Limited — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Limited

Since 2017, Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Limited has appeared as a respondent in 9 employment tribunal cases, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 9
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

10 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	5
02	Working time regulations	4
03	Unlawful deduction from wages	3
04	Breach of contract	3
05	Race discrimination	2
06	Religion or belief discrimination	2
07	Flexible working	1
08	Redundancy	1
09	Age discrimination	1
10	Disability discrimination	1

All cases

9 cases · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
6015477/2024	24 November 2025	England & Wales	Mrs J Robinson	Flexible working	—
1405332/2023	6 February 2024	England & Wales	Ms F Rautu	Redundancy, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
3302663/2023	13 December 2023	England & Wales	Mr Jose Almeida	Breach of contract, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—
2601629/2022	7 February 2023	England & Wales	Ms J P Keane	Breach of contract, Race discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations	—
1302216/2022	18 November 2022	England & Wales	Mr C Liburd	Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	—
2601391/2021	9 July 2021	England & Wales	Mr. O Trinh	Age discrimination, Disability discrimination, Religion or belief discrimination, Unfair dismissal	—
2502240/2019	12 March 2020	England & Wales	Mr C Maddock	Unfair dismissal	—
2414419/2019	6 March 2020	England & Wales	Mr R Taha	Race discrimination, Religion or belief discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.