How much compensation do other claims award at an employment tribunal?

Across 1,846 UK other tribunal cases with a recorded remedy since 2017, the median total award was £3,402 and the largest was £658,333.

What percentage of other claims succeed at an employment tribunal?

Of 9,673 other claims decided on the merits by UK tribunals, 51% were upheld.

How many UK other employment tribunal cases are there?

Tribunal Watch has indexed 7,938 other employment tribunal judgments published on gov.uk since 2017.

Loading…

Top

Other compensation & tribunal success rate — UK data (page 148) | Tribunal Watch

Claim pillar

Other employment tribunal cases — UK data 2017–present

Name: Other UK employment tribunal statistics
Creator: Tribunal Watch
License: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/

Tribunal Watch has indexed 7,938 UK employment tribunal cases involving other claims, published on gov.uk since 2017. Where compensation was recorded, the median award was £3,402 (the largest £658,333) across 1,846 cases. Tribunals upheld 51% of the 9,673 decided other claims. These cases name 6,376 distinct employers as respondents.

Total cases: 7,938
Median award: £3,402
Claims upheld: 51%
Largest single award: £658,333
Distinct employers: 6,376
England & Wales: 6,762
Scotland: 1,176

Compensation in other cases

1,846 cases with a recorded award

Median: £3,402
Mean: £9,128
25th percentile: £1,393
75th percentile: £8,960
90th percentile: £18,364
Largest: £658,333

Figures are the total award recorded across cases that include a other claim and a published remedy — 1,846 of 7,938 other cases. Many tribunal judgments decide liability only, with compensation set at a later hearing, so they are not counted here. A judgment combining several claim types contributes its whole award. Nothing here is legal advice or a prediction of any individual outcome.

Outcomes of other claims

30,074 adjudicated claims

Outcome	Claims	Share
Withdrawn	11,380	38%
Struck out	7,795	26%
Upheld	4,973	17%
Dismissed	4,700	16%
Other	1,074	4%
Settled	152	1%

Counting only claims a tribunal decided on the merits (upheld or dismissed), 51% of other claims were upheld — 4,973 of 9,673. Settled and withdrawn claims are excluded from that rate. Outcomes are recorded per claim, so a judgment can uphold one claim and dismiss another.

Other cases per year

2017–2026

Year	Cases	Trend
2017	81
2018	134
2019	1,010
2020	1,239
2021	1,163
2022	1,232
2023	1,038
2024	895
2025	806
2026	340

Largest other awards

Top 8 by total award

Case ref.	Decided	Claimant	Primary respondent	Total award
1600759/2023	16 October 2023	Mr M David and others (see Appendix 1)	DRB Group Limited	£658,333
2303760/2022	19 April 2023	Mr P Smith & Others	GX Technology EAME Limited (in liquidation)	£492,728
2202063/2014	8 November 2019	Mr M Epstein For	Government of the State of Qatar	£388,920
1600183/2021	27 November 2020	Ms Peak Ong	Aberystwyth University	£264,442
2300471/2021	27 March 2023	Mr O Mason & Others (see attached schedule)	Artificial Solutions UK Ltd (in Liquidation)	£173,619
2302114/2018	18 September 2019	Mr N MacGregor & Others (see attached schedule)	Designer Ideas Limited Trading as Warren Evans (in administration)	£150,773
1400990/2018	24 May 2019	Ms L Harris - counsel For the	Mr P Jewell - consultant	£150,587
3314136/2022	16 December 2024	(1) Mr G Krason (2) Mr Robert Chyrc (3) Mr Deividas Samauskas (4) Mr Andrew Sadler (5) Mrs Natalie Mallard (6) Mr Adrian Andrews (7) Mr Wilford Jones (8) Mr Neil Packman (9) Mr Guntis Stepans (10)Mr Andrew Collins

Top employers — other cases

20 ranked by case count

#	Employer	Cases
01	Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy	428
02	Secretary of State for Business & Trade	267
03	Qube Qualifications and Development Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)	100
04	Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)	89
05	Knights of Old Limited (in administration),	79
06	Thomas Cook Group UK Travel Ltd (in compulsory liquidation)	79
07	Testerworld Limited	70
08	Thomas Cook	46
09	Debenhams Retail Limited (in Administration)	36
10	STA Travel Limited (in liquidation)	29
11	HS Realisations Limited (Formerly Hewden Stuart Ltd)	27
12	Cleveland Bridge UK Limited (in administration)	26
13	Sonetik UK Ltd (In voluntary liquidation)

All other cases

7,938 cases · page 148 of 159 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Claimant	Primary respondent	Jurisdiction	Total award
1800916/2019	8 August 2019	Mr. P Potaczek	Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)	England & Wales	—
1800976/2019	8 August 2019	Mr. M Poo	Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)	England & Wales	—
1800830/2019	8 August 2019	Mrs. M Dunnill	Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)	England & Wales	—
1401937/2018	8 August 2019	Mr Mark Patterson (1) Mr Michael Sandford (2) Mr David Ball (3) Mr Stephen Kempton (4)	Wipro Limited	England & Wales	—
2303596/2017	8 August 2019	Miss J Cella	The Chief Constable Of Kent Police	England & Wales	—
1800787/2019	8 August 2019	Mr. W Gerona	Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)	England & Wales	—
1800812/2019	8 August 2019	Mr. G White	Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)	England & Wales	—
1403761/2018

Methodology

Cases on this page are identified by first-pass extraction against the locked §4.4 claim-type taxonomy — a judgment enters the other caseload if otheris tagged in its classification output. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Per-claim outcomes come from the second-pass (LLM-assisted) extraction and are recorded for each claim a judgment decides; the success rate counts only claims a tribunal decided on the merits (upheld or dismissed). Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are excluded from the compensation figures. Regional splits follow the tribunal's jurisdiction as recorded on gov.uk. Nothing on this page is legal advice or a prediction of any outcome; for any specific matter the gov.uk judgment PDF linked from each case page is the authoritative source.