Unlawful deduction from wages compensation & tribunal success rate — UK data (page 31) | Tribunal Watch
Claim pillar
Unlawful deduction from wages employment tribunal cases — UK data 2017–present
Tribunal Watch has indexed 36,988 UK employment tribunal cases involving unlawful deduction from wages claims, published on gov.uk since 2017. Where compensation was recorded, the median award was £2,385 (the largest £3,449,329) across 15,319 cases. Tribunals upheld 76% of the 20,985 decided unlawful deduction from wages claims. These cases name 28,663 distinct employers as respondents.
Total cases
36,988
Median award
£2,385
Claims upheld
76%
Largest single award
£3,449,329
Distinct employers
28,663
England & Wales
32,339
Scotland
4,649
Compensation in unlawful deduction from wages cases
15,319 cases with a recorded award
Median
£2,385
Mean
£6,862
25th percentile
£967
75th percentile
£6,336
90th percentile
£15,380
Largest
£3,449,329
Figures are the total award recorded across cases that include a unlawful deduction from wages claim and a published remedy — 15,319 of 36,988 unlawful deduction from wages cases. Many tribunal judgments decide liability only, with compensation set at a later hearing, so they are not counted here. A judgment combining several claim types contributes its whole award. Nothing here is legal advice or a prediction of any individual outcome.
Outcomes of unlawful deduction from wages claims
25,875 adjudicated claims
Outcome
Claims
Share
Upheld
15,936
62%
Dismissed
5,049
20%
Struck out
2,086
8%
Withdrawn
2,051
8%
Other
552
2%
Settled
201
1%
Counting only claims a tribunal decided on the merits (upheld or dismissed), 76% of unlawful deduction from wages claims were upheld — 15,936 of 20,985. Settled and withdrawn claims are excluded from that rate. Outcomes are recorded per claim, so a judgment can uphold one claim and dismiss another.
Cases on this page are identified by first-pass extraction against the locked §4.4 claim-type taxonomy — a judgment enters the unlawful deduction from wages caseload if unlawful deduction from wagesis tagged in its classification output. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Per-claim outcomes come from the second-pass (LLM-assisted) extraction and are recorded for each claim a judgment decides; the success rate counts only claims a tribunal decided on the merits (upheld or dismissed). Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are excluded from the compensation figures. Regional splits follow the tribunal's jurisdiction as recorded on gov.uk. Nothing on this page is legal advice or a prediction of any outcome; for any specific matter the gov.uk judgment PDF linked from each case page is the authoritative source.
Mr Arjay Calpo Barcarse Respondent 1: The Samurai Kitchen Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 2: Sore De Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 3: The Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Ms Justyna Szmidt Respondent 1: The Samurai Kitchen Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 2: Sore De Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 3: The Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Mrs Kristina Margaret Wren Respondent 1: The Samurai Kitchen Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 2: Sore De Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 3: The Secretary of State for Business and Trade
ETZ 4(WR) IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) Judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Case No: 8002488/2025 Heard on the Cloud Based Video Platform, at Edinburgh, on March 2026 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno Mr C Jones