Royal Mail Group Limited

Since 2017, Royal Mail Group Limited has appeared as a respondent in 629 employment tribunal cases, with £478,522 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Companies House: 04138203
Status: Active
SIC code: 53100
Indexed: 23 September 2026

Total cases: 629
Total awarded against: £478,522
Largest award: £77,570
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Cases by claim type

19 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	324
02	Disability discrimination	189
03	Working time regulations	152
04	Unlawful deduction from wages	119
05	Race discrimination	63
06	Breach of contract	57
07	Sex discrimination	30
08	Whistleblowing	28
09	Age discrimination	23
10	Trade union	20
11	Religion or belief discrimination

All cases

630 cases · page 6 of 13 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
1805936/2022	13 April 2023	England & Wales	Mr O Ogunbayo	Race discrimination, Religion or belief discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations	—
3313788/2022	6 April 2023	England & Wales	Mrs R SARAI	Disability discrimination	—
1800476/2023	5 April 2023	England & Wales	Ms R Biggins and	Sex discrimination	—
2602980/2022	31 March 2023	England & Wales	Mr I Patel	Unlawful deduction from wages	£1,411
1308991/2022	29 March 2023	England & Wales	Luke Rowlands	Breach of contract, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2401433/2022	28 March 2023	England & Wales	Mr F Roles and Mr P Bond	Unfair dismissal	—
2304391/2022	24 March 2023	England & Wales	—	Unlawful deduction from wages	—
3207350/2021	20 March 2023	England & Wales	Mr S Smith	Disability discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.