Royal Mail Group Limited

Since 2017, Royal Mail Group Limited has appeared as a respondent in 612 employment tribunal cases, with £398,556 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Companies House: 04138203
Status: Active
SIC code: 53100
Indexed: 6 June 2026

Total cases: 612
Total awarded against: £398,556
Largest award: £77,570
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Cases by claim type

18 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	311
02	Disability discrimination	183
03	Working time regulations	152
04	Unlawful deduction from wages	118
05	Race discrimination	62
06	Breach of contract	56
07	Sex discrimination	30
08	Whistleblowing	25
09	Age discrimination	23
10	Trade union	20
11	Religion or belief discrimination

All cases

613 cases · page 3 of 13 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
6000752/2024	16 May 2025	England & Wales	Mr M Iles	Disability discrimination	—
1401270/2024	15 May 2025	England & Wales	Mr. R. Sunder	Age discrimination, Disability discrimination, Race discrimination	—
3313367/2023	15 May 2025	England & Wales	Mr N Laurent	Disability discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2408623/2022	14 May 2025	England & Wales	Mr F Mulla	Disability discrimination, Race discrimination	—
1602291/2023	7 May 2025	England & Wales	Mr S Smith	Working time regulations	£492
2409519/2022	22 April 2025	England & Wales	Mr A Carroll	Disability discrimination	£5,975
6014819/2024	7 April 2025	England & Wales	Mr A Healy	Unfair dismissal	—
3301215/2024	29 March 2025	England & Wales	Mr E Kumordji	Race discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.